Baypines (Sandestin) Homes for Sale

Living in Baypines (Sandestin)

The county's subdivision header for series 26-2S-21-42500 reads Bay Pines Ph 1&2 (Sandestin) and lists Bay Pines Phase 1 and Phase 2. Parcel legal descriptions cite Plat Book 10, page 21 for Phase 1 (Lots 8856 through 8868) and Plat Book 10, page 45 for Phase 2 (Lots 8850 through 8855 and 8870 through 8880); the legal for Lot 8869 reads Phase 2 beside page 21. A second, information-only row under the same series reads Bayside Homeowners Assoc, Baypines Lane and existing lake within Phase 1 of Bay-, and the county text breaks off there mid-word. This page claims no surveyed boundary, association terms or lake access.

Thirty-four map outlines collapse to 32 parcel numbers: 31 coded single family, and one note-record parcel drawn in three pieces of about 0.3, 0.4 and 1.0 acre. The note parcel is not a residence, a listing, or evidence of association membership.

Against those 32 parcels the county's address layer carries 34 rows. Thirty-one carry Miramar Beach and ZIP 32550, all on Baypine Drive with Sandestin as the place label, and the three blank rows belong to the note parcel. That locates the records without deciding mailing status or occupancy.

Overlaying the 34 outlines on Walton's flood layer and on FEMA's national layer puts Zone AE under every one, with the base flood elevation at 7, 8 or 9 feet depending on the spot. Nine outlines touch only the 7-foot ground, 15 touch two elevations, and ten touch all three. Thirty-one outlines lie wholly inside Zone AE, and the other three also include a band of the shaded 0.2-percent-annual-chance area. Treat these as dated lot-by-lot map overlays, with no building elevation in them, no insurance ruling, and no single answer for the whole community.

On August 19, 2026, a listing search covering Miramar Beach showed 31 sold listings and one active; 30 of the sold were single-family homes and one was a condominium. Nothing active turned up under the name outside Miramar Beach. Because the county series holds only single-family lots, the condominium shows the count was matched by name and is not a tally of these lots. The figures belong to that August 19 name search alone and say nothing about what is listed today.